<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/11019</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ministerdod</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/11019#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>ministerdod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/11019#comment-481</guid>
		<description>In this post we have several problems. One Rush Limbaugh could not use Christopher Reeves name in the same way he used the Fox commercial. Chris could not possibly get any worst he had not meds that helped ease his condition. The Fox endorsement was incorrect and you who defend his endorsement of this type of research should
Always be held in contempt, your support of abortion on demand is evident and this is just another way to profit from that industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this post we have several problems. One Rush Limbaugh could not use Christopher Reeves name in the same way he used the Fox commercial. Chris could not possibly get any worst he had not meds that helped ease his condition. The Fox endorsement was incorrect and you who defend his endorsement of this type of research should<br />
Always be held in contempt, your support of abortion on demand is evident and this is just another way to profit from that industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onyxpony</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/11019#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>onyxpony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/11019#comment-193</guid>
		<description>I find it curiously interesting that when Michael J. Fox was interviewed AFTER all the hulabaloo about his medication, and AFTER the comments from Rush Limbaugh, he was able to stand behind a podium almost perfectly normal while making comments to the media. That in itself answered any questions I had, even before a word came out of his mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it curiously interesting that when Michael J. Fox was interviewed AFTER all the hulabaloo about his medication, and AFTER the comments from Rush Limbaugh, he was able to stand behind a podium almost perfectly normal while making comments to the media. That in itself answered any questions I had, even before a word came out of his mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azoric</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/11019#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>azoric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/11019#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Rush's primary criticism of Fox was not that he was exaggerating (that quote was taken out of context), but that Fox was incorrect in his statements about stem cell research.  

In his book, Fox does admit to being off his medication so as to more visibly illustrate the ravages of Parkinson’s disease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush&#8217;s primary criticism of Fox was not that he was exaggerating (that quote was taken out of context), but that Fox was incorrect in his statements about stem cell research.  </p>
<p>In his book, Fox does admit to being off his medication so as to more visibly illustrate the ravages of Parkinson’s disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
