<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Culturalism by John Kenneth Press</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/110067</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: john kenneth press</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/110067#comment-88036</link>
		<dc:creator>john kenneth press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/110067#comment-88036</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review.  My point with Puritanism, prohibition, and the Immigration Act of 1924 are that we have a history of guiding our culture (culturism).  I also try to caution against any restrictions of freedom that would violate our traditional love of liberty.  But admit it is a hard course to steer and ask that we guide ourselves with tradition.       

The alternative, saying that all attempts at cultural control are facist and may not be considered, may not be sustainable.  It provides no discretion and actually undermines our collective ability to make choices, that is self-governance. Indeed we do have immigration laws and prevent porn from airing on primetime.  So the idea that control and freedom are incompatable is not true.  

Thanks for the review.  Find out more at www.culturism.us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review.  My point with Puritanism, prohibition, and the Immigration Act of 1924 are that we have a history of guiding our culture (culturism).  I also try to caution against any restrictions of freedom that would violate our traditional love of liberty.  But admit it is a hard course to steer and ask that we guide ourselves with tradition.       </p>
<p>The alternative, saying that all attempts at cultural control are facist and may not be considered, may not be sustainable.  It provides no discretion and actually undermines our collective ability to make choices, that is self-governance. Indeed we do have immigration laws and prevent porn from airing on primetime.  So the idea that control and freedom are incompatable is not true.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the review.  Find out more at <a href="http://www.culturism.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.culturism.us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeMorgan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/110067#comment-86489</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeMorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/110067#comment-86489</guid>
		<description>Racism is a propaganda word used to harm European people.

When white Gentiles discriminate it is called racism. When Jews discriminate it is called Zionism. When nonwhites discriminate it is called tribalism, "fighting for justice," Civil Rights, ethnic conflict. etc.

The reason for this is that our species is a predatory species, that is why everyone who belongs to a healthy race discriminates when it is in their ethnic interests.

Those who belong to a beta race, a defeated race, fear discriminating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Racism is a propaganda word used to harm European people.</p>
<p>When white Gentiles discriminate it is called racism. When Jews discriminate it is called Zionism. When nonwhites discriminate it is called tribalism, &#8220;fighting for justice,&#8221; Civil Rights, ethnic conflict. etc.</p>
<p>The reason for this is that our species is a predatory species, that is why everyone who belongs to a healthy race discriminates when it is in their ethnic interests.</p>
<p>Those who belong to a beta race, a defeated race, fear discriminating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
